<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic&#8217;s 3D Camcorder Gambit: the AG-3DA1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nycppnews.com/2010/02/15/panasonics-3d-camcorder-gambit-the-ag-3da1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nycppnews.com/2010/02/15/panasonics-3d-camcorder-gambit-the-ag-3da1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=panasonics-3d-camcorder-gambit-the-ag-3da1</link>
	<description>News &#38; Resources for NYC Motion Media Producers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://nycppnews.com/2010/02/15/panasonics-3d-camcorder-gambit-the-ag-3da1/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 03:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycppnews.com/?p=710#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment. Initially I agreed with you, but it seems Panasonic has had a lot of orders since NAB, well before the October delivery. I think a lot of folks like the simplicity of an all in one system and are jumping in to just figure out how the production process works out. 

As long as you&#039;re not planning to do a project that requires large screen projection, those small sensors might be adequate. Australian broadcast networks are in the midst of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/9TVWFP&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nine-week test&lt;/a&gt; of sports footage from the 3DA1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment. Initially I agreed with you, but it seems Panasonic has had a lot of orders since NAB, well before the October delivery. I think a lot of folks like the simplicity of an all in one system and are jumping in to just figure out how the production process works out. </p>
<p>As long as you&#8217;re not planning to do a project that requires large screen projection, those small sensors might be adequate. Australian broadcast networks are in the midst of a <a href="http://bit.ly/9TVWFP" rel="nofollow">nine-week test</a> of sports footage from the 3DA1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantron</title>
		<link>http://nycppnews.com/2010/02/15/panasonics-3d-camcorder-gambit-the-ag-3da1/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 20:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nycppnews.com/?p=710#comment-321</guid>
		<description>This Panny 3D duckie is D-E-A-D in the water. Sure, there will be some suckers who will pay $21,000 for a 1/4-inch CMOS sensor camcorder with the by now wholly discredited, notorious rolling shutter.  It&#039;s just they would be overpaying for this particular AG-3DA1 camcorder by a good $17-18,000. As a 3D toy, it is just way too expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Panny 3D duckie is D-E-A-D in the water. Sure, there will be some suckers who will pay $21,000 for a 1/4-inch CMOS sensor camcorder with the by now wholly discredited, notorious rolling shutter.  It&#8217;s just they would be overpaying for this particular AG-3DA1 camcorder by a good $17-18,000. As a 3D toy, it is just way too expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

